Reb Jeff
  • Blog
  • About
  • Favorites
  • Resources
    • Counting of the Omer
  • Wedding Officiation
  • Contact Me
  • Temple Sinai

The Joyful Imperative to Interpret

3/20/2012

 
Picture
What happens when a law written in the 1930s collides with the medical technology and social patterns of the 21st century? That is the essential question of a case argued today before the United States Supreme Court. It is also the kind of question that Jewish tradition must grapple with all of the time. It presents a legal puzzle that is excruciatingly difficult for us to solve, but we should be delighted to have the opportunity.

The law in question is the Social Security Act, as amended by Congress in 1939. The technology in question is in vitro fertilization, the medical technique devised in the 1970s for fertilizing human egg cells with sperm in a laboratory to be implanted into a woman's uterus for normal pregnancy and birth. The case involves a woman, Karen Capato, whose doctors performed the procedure in 2003 to allow her to become pregnant with sperm from her husband, Robert Capato, who had died a year earlier. After giving birth to twins, Ms. Capato sought Social Security benefits for her children. This is a benefit, she argues, to which the twins are entitled as the surviving children of a deceased wage-earning parent. 

The Social Security Administration denied Ms. Capato's claim, as it has done in roughly one hundred similar cases, because of the way that it interprets the Social Security Act. The Social Security Administration states that Ms. Capato's twins are not eligible for the benefit because they are not her husband's legal heirs according to the laws of our great state of Florida. Of course, it would have been difficult for Mr. Capato to have listed the children in his will, since he died before they even were conceived.

What a lovely, convoluted dispute. Either Ms. Capato is right, and children can be the dependents of a man who did not live long enough for them to have ever depended on him, or the Social Security Administration is right, and a man can sire children with his wife and still not be their father. What a mess. How do we find a way out of it?

This is where the U.S. Supreme Court steps in. The court must decide how to interpret a law about parents and children that was written before the discovery of DNA. They must, somehow, answer questions about the intent of the law regarding the realities of frozen sperm, in vitro fertilization, surrogate pregnancy, and a host of other new technologies and techniques that the writers of the law could not have anticipated.

And that does not even begin to explain the difficult in interpreting the law in this situation.

During oral arguments today, members of the Supreme Court raised further questions. Does the fact that Karen Capato was married to Robert Capato make any difference to the outcome of the case, or could a mother seek benefits for children from any deceased sperm donor? What definition of "child" and "parent" should be used in interpreting the law? When members of Congress used the word "child" in 1939, they were thinking about the offspring of a legally married couple. Does using that definition make any sense today considering the social realities of 2012? 

The difficulty facing the Supreme Court in interpreting the Social Security Act arises not just because of changing medical technology. The problems are even more deeply rooted in the changes in the assumptions, social conventions and patterns of our entire society. 

Yet, interpretation is the only choice in a case like this. How could it be otherwise? It would be foolish to insist on following the "literal meaning" of the law. In 1939, children who came into the world like these twins literally did not exist. It would be equally pointless to demand that we follow the "original intent" of the people who wrote the law. Even if we could go back in time to ask them, do you think they could answer questions about in vitro fertilization any better than we can? 

Whether we like it or not, interpretation is the only way to make this law work for this situation in the present day. There is no "plain meaning" to fall back on. We are stuck having to answer unanswerable questions like, "When is a 'child' in 1939 not a 'child' in 2012?"

I am not, by any means, a scholar of U.S. law, so I may have misunderstood some of the legal subtleties in this case. (I offer my apologies to lawyers everywhere.) However, I find this case fascinating for what it teaches about the nature of law and interpretation—issues that strike the core of Judaism. 

When the rabbis of antiquity and of our own day try to interpret the Torah, they are not dealing with a document that was written for the technology and social conventions of a mere seventy years ago. The Torah, if you believe historians, came into its present form around the fifth century b.c.e.—a time when most people were slaves, everyone lived in mortal terror of a bad harvest and the starvation it would bring, justice was barely distinguishable from vengeance, and knowing how to read would make you a member of the intellectual elite.

Fitting the society for which it was written, the Torah contains laws about the right way to kill the guy who murdered your cousin, laws about which grasshoppers are okay to eat, and laws about how to marry a woman you captured in battle. The Torah assumes, to say the least, a completely different world from the one in which we live. The rabbis of the Talmud, who lived some 800 years after this, were baffled by many of the laws in the Torah. Today, 2,500 years after the time of Ezra the Scribe, we are lucky just to be able to read it. Yet, for more than two thousand years, we Jews have struggled to interpret the Torah to apply it to the needs of the times. 

And it's a good thing, too. If observing the Torah meant that we had to recreate the world that produced the Torah, we would be stuck in a late-iron-age reality of disease, illiteracy, famine and short, miserable lives. Interpreting the Torah is the only option we have to keep it alive.

As with the laws of our country, it is pointless to believe in an "original intention" or "literal meaning" of the Torah that will guide us to certainty. We learn what we can about the time and place in which the Torah appeared, but we still have such a poor understanding of that society that we often struggle just to understand the plain, surface meaning of the text, let alone the intentions. Even if we could know how the people who first heard the Torah understood its meaning, that would not tell us how to apply it to situations they could not have imagined. 

Figuring out how to read the Torah in a world of light bulbs, internal combustion engines, climate change, presidential elections, multiculturalism, and imitation crab meat is difficult. The alternative, though, is to stick our heads in the sand and pretend that nothing in the world has changed since Judah the Prince completed the Mishnah. Interpretation means that we can change. It also means that we can discover the things within the Torah that never change—its values, its beauty, its story about the way we come to know God.

I do not know, and I am not qualified to predict, how the U.S. Supreme Court will decide on the Social Security benefits that Ms. Capato claims for her twins. I am led to believe, though, that they will weigh the meaning of the words of the law against what they can reckon about the people who created those words. Before they are done, they will think about what is right, what is fair, and what will help create the best society we can have right now. Then they will forge an answer that can be explained using the words of a great legal tradition.

That is also what we do with Torah when we undertake the joyful act of interpreting it. We consider the context, as best we can understand, in which Torah was given. We think about the moral and spiritual lessons of Torah and how they have been understood by all our great teachers since Sinai. We use the forms, symbols and words of our people to express a Torah that embodies the highest within us for the world around us.

Other Posts on This Theme:
Mishpatim: The Purpose of the Torah
Vayeshev: Dreams and Dreamers
Pinchas: Five Sisters Who Turned the Key to Unlock the Torah
Reb Rachel link
3/20/2012 01:23:44 am

<em>Interpretation means that we can change. It also means that we can discover the things within the Torah that never change—its values, its beauty, its story about the way we come to know God.</em>

Yes yes yes! Thank you for this wonderful post.

Barb L.
3/20/2012 10:29:35 am

Terrific post! Fascinating legal case and great way of relating it to what Torah study is all about!

Luz Hellman
3/26/2012 12:47:07 pm

Thank you, great post! I have been following the Capato case and am looking forward to reading the supreme's interpretation and reasoning. Yes, there is great joy when we open ourselves to new interpretations of Torah.


Comments are closed.

    Welcome

    This blog is about living a joyful Jewish life and bringing joy to synagogues and the Jewish community. Join the conversation by commenting on posts and sharing your experiences. For more on the topic, read the First Post.
    "Like" Reb Jeff on FB

    RSS Feed

    Enter your email address to subscribe to Reb Jeff posts by email

    Follow Reb Jeff's Tweets

    Recent Posts

    Purim & COVID-19
    ​The Honor of Heaven
    Chasing Our Own Tails
    Drilling Under Your Seat
    Change the World
    Self-Righteousness
    Where We Came From
    What We Must Believe
    ​Is Passover 7 or 8 Days?Origin Story
    Va'eira: Leadership​

    Jeff's Favorites

    • First Post
    • Searching for How the Bible Defines Marriage 
    • The Difference between God and Religion
    • In the Beginning of What?
    • Rape, Abortion and Judaism
    • Ten Thoughts about Being a Rabbi
    • Temple Dues and Don'ts
    • A Pesach Lesson from Yoga
    • The Purpose of the Torah

    Torah Portions

    Genesis
    Bereshit
    Noach
    Lech Lecha
    Vayera
    Chayei Sarah
    Toledot
    Vayetze
    Vayishlach
    Vayeshev
    Miketz
    Vayigash
    Vayechi

    Exodus
    Shemot
    Va'eira
    Bo
    Beshalach
    Yitro
    Mishpatim
    Terumah
    Tetzaveh
    Ki Tisa
    Vayakhel
    Pekudei

    Leviticus
    Vayikra
    Tzav
    Shemini
    Tazria
    Metzora
    Acharei Mot
    Kedoshim
    Emor
    Behar
    Bechukotai

    Numbers
    Bamidbar
    Naso
    Beha'alotecha
    Shelach
    Korach
    Chukat
    Balak
    Pinchas
    Matot
    Masei

    Deuteronomy
    Devarim
    Va'etchanan
    Ekev
    Re'eh
    Shoftim
    Ki Tetze
    Ki Tavo
    Nitzavim
    Vayelech
    Ha'azinu
    Vezot Haberachah

    Holidays
    Shabbat
    Rosh Chodesh
    Pesach/Passover
    Omer Period
    Yom HaShoah
    Yom HaZikaron
    Yom Ha'atzma'ut
    Pesach Sheini
    Lag B'Omer
    Yom Yerushalayim
    Shavuot
    Fast of Tammuz
    Tisha B'Av
    Tu B'Av
    Rosh Hashanah
    Days of Awe
    Yom Kippur
    Sukkot
    Hoshanah Rabbah
    Shmini Atzeret/
    Simchat Torah
    Chanukah
    Tu BiShvat
    Adar (Joy Increases!)
    Purim

    Archives

    November 2022
    September 2022
    May 2022
    January 2022
    September 2021
    September 2020
    August 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    October 2019
    September 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011

    Loading
    Jewish Bloggers
    Powered By Ringsurf
    Picture